Thursday, February 19, 2009

Talking Down America

After just one month as our President, I am starting to see a consistent theme from the Obama Administration. That theme is the constant drum beat of talking down America and all that it stands for. Just listen to Obama's speech that he gave in Phoenix where he revealed his plan for "fixing" the home mortgage crisis. Yes, I understand that the country is currently in some tough economic times, especially for those folks who have lost their jobs over the past six months, but we are not in the worst of times since the Great Depression.

I was alive when Jimmy Carter was president and the economy was in a deeper recession then; unemployment was in double-digits, gas shortages were rampant and was being rationed and interest rates for home mortgages were 18% or higher. So, we are not there yet, however if you listen to his speech it almost sounds like that is where he wants to take us. In this 10 minute speech he said "crisis" 24 times. This link has the full text of the speech. If he truly wants to see this economy turn around then bring some optimism when you are talking to America.

Not only is Obama talking down America but U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder has taken it to a whole new level. Below is the video of our nation's chief law enforcement officer giving a speech earlier this week. Has Attorney General Holder forgotten Martin Luther King, Jr's "I Have a Dream" speech where he said, "I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character".



Attorney General Holder's speech really saddens me.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Words From Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson's words ring true now more than ever especially from the wake of the wonderfully new (of course said with sarcasm) and just signed into law (Anti)Stimulus Bill. I just hope over the next four years more people in this wonderful land of ours take these quotes to heart.

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not.

My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.

Delay is preferable to error.


Tuesday, February 17, 2009

We Need Limited Government

While observing what the federal government has done over the last months of the Bush Administration and the first month of the Obama Administration, I am reminded of the famous quote from the movie, "Cool Hand Luke", "What we have here is a failure to communicate". It is really more accurate to say, "What we have here is a failure to understand and comprehend". Because, based upon their actions both of these leaders are ignoring the wise words of our nations forefathers.

Our forefathers fully understood by limiting the power and size of our government, citizens would be empowered to pursue their inalienable rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Thomas Jefferson recognized the importance of limited government as can be seen in his First Inaugural address that he delivered on March 4, 1801.

If we expect to dig ourselves out of this economic downturn and spurn economic growth, private sector innovation and promote small business then we have got to stop the overreach and power grab of our federal government.

Another Honor Killing

I am not sure whether or not you all have heard about this story of Muzzammil Hassan from Orchard Park, New York, just outside of Buffalo, who beheaded his wife, Aasiya Hassan, last week at his office. Here is the story from the Buffalo News.

Let me fill you in a few more details about this story. Mr. Hassan was the founder of Bridges TV, a television station established to improve the image of Muslims in the United States. So, it is quite ironic that Mr. Hassan committed this gruesome honor killing in the office that he founded to build bridges between American Muslims and other Americans. Here is a link to a New York Sun article written in October of 2006 that basically describes some of the programming at this television network.

The other outrageous reality that this story has brought to light is the drive-by media's (a.k.a. MSM) lack of coverage of honor killings like this. In fact, NBC News is familiar with Mr. Hassan since they presented a story about Bridges TV in 2004.



Have you heard of this story of the two teenage daughters killed by their Muslim father from Dallas-Fort Worth area in Texas?



Why is the MSM not covering these events and other events like these, like we think they should? This is something worth investigating.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Census Move

Obama taking control of the Census from the Commerce Department and under his Chief-of-Staff Rohm Emanuel is nothing but a pure power grab by the Obama Administration. The overreach of this administration just continues roll. Once again the MSM is silent about this potential move. Obama and his administration can do no wrong.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

True Cost of the Generational Theft Act (a.k.a. Stimulus Bill)

I know that I should stop harping on this but this Stimulus Bill is not worth the 1,100 plus pages that it was written on. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) asked the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) for a report to give us a true impact of what the cost of this package will be over the next 10 years. According to the CBO report the cost will be $2.527 trillion in spending with another $744 billion in debt servicing. Basically, this bill will cost over $3.27 trillion over the next 10 years.

And we all know who gets to pay for this mess. Hold onto your wallets and the wallets of your children and grandchildren as well.

Here is the link from The Heritage Foundation that has more details about the overall cost.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Senator Gregg Listens to Advice

It looks like Senator Gregg listened to the advice I gave him a couple of weeks ago. Thankfully, the (Anti)Stimulus Bill along with the power grab of the U.S. Census pushed Senator Gregg to withdraw as Commerce Secretary in Obama's administration.

Here are the details about Senator Gregg's withdrawal.

You can see my advice here.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Senator Stabenow Ready for (Un) Fairness Doctrine

Senator Debbie Stabenow tells liberal radio talk show host Bill Press that she and the Senate are ready to begin talks around re-constituting the Fairness Doctrine. Below is the full audio of her conversation with Bill Press on his radio show. Notice how she says it could be called the Fairness Doctrine or something different. It sounds like she has already met with and discussed it with some of her senator buddies. Get ready to fight against another Democrat overreach to shut down all opposition voices to their agenda.

Backing into Socialized Health Care with Stimulus

I am not sure that all of the Senators know what exactly is in the Stimulus Bill. If they take a close look they will see that significant changes will be made in our health care in the United States. Basically, with this Stimulus Bill a new health care bureaucracy will be created, the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology. This bureaucracy will monitor medical treatments in order to make sure that your doctor and/or hospital is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective. Now that is truly scary. Also, hospitals and doctors that do not utilize this system in a “meaningful way” will face penalties.

To understand more of the details on these health care initiatives and provisions in the Stimulus bill read Betsy McCaughey’s commentary on Bloomberg. Here is the link: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601039&refer=columnist_mccaughey&sid=aLzfDxfbwhzs

Friday, February 6, 2009

Rebuttal to President Obama's Stimulus Bill Op Ed

I am old enough to remember the malaise our 39th President brought to the country. From the start of President Carter’s term, when the country was in need of strong encouragement and stability from its national political leadership, Carter continued to deflate the confidence and pride of the country with his pessimistic attitude and constant chastising of the American citizenry.

With his Washington Post opinion editorial piece, President Obama has brought back memories of Jimmy Carter’s Presidency. President Obama needs to be careful with his pessimism. Our nation looks to its President to bring stability and confidence. President Obama’s constant bantering that times will get much worse before they get better will turn into a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Let’s review and discuss President Obama’s Washington Post opinion editorial section by section. :


By now, it's clear to everyone that we have inherited an economic crisis as deep and dire as any since the days of the Great Depression. Millions of jobs that Americans relied on just a year ago are gone; millions more of the nest eggs families worked so hard to build have vanished. People everywhere are worried about what tomorrow will bring.

What Americans expect from Washington is action that matches the urgency they feel in their daily lives -- action that's swift, bold and wise enough for us to climb out of this crisis.


Yes, people are upset that they have lost their jobs and/or have lost a large chunk of their investment portfolio. However, people are also angry that the legislators (Congressman Frank, Senator Dodd, et al.) who are responsible for the housing, mortgage and credit problems that we are currently encountering now have even more power. These legislators appear to be above the law and do not have to answer to anyone about these issues. In fact, these people have the audacity to say that they did not even see this coming. And these are the same folks that said during the “Bailout” bills and are now saying about the “Stimulus” bill that we must pass something and we must pass it yesterday. What I expect as an American is that we hold the people that are responsible for these problems accountable. These legislators should be removed from their leadership positions.

Because each day we wait to begin the work of turning our economy around, more people lose their jobs, their savings and their homes. And if nothing is done, this recession might linger for years. Our economy will lose 5 million more jobs. Unemployment will approach double digits. Our nation will sink deeper into a crisis that, at some point, we may not be able to reverse.

That's why I feel such a sense of urgency about the recovery plan before Congress. With it, we will create or save more than 3 million jobs over the next two years, provide immediate tax relief to 95 percent of American workers, ignite spending by businesses and consumers alike, and take steps to strengthen our country for years to come.

This plan is more than a prescription for short-term spending -- it's a strategy for America's long-term growth and opportunity in areas such as renewable energy, health care and education. And it's a strategy that will be implemented with unprecedented transparency and accountability, so Americans know where their tax dollars are going and how they are being spent.


Now there is some encouragement for you! If the federal government fails to act we will be in such a deep crisis that it will be irreversible. Apparently, if we don’t act quickly we will be in recession or depression for eternity. President Obama, my sentiments are the exact opposite. If we act in haste and it is the “wrong” thing to do, we could prolong the recession. One thing that always raises a red flag is when someone says, “We must act now or else”. Perhaps we should give the market a chance to correct itself, and the market (which is the fairest way) will determine the winners and losers, not the government.

I have some questions for President Obama. Why aren’t we giving 100% of the tax-payers tax relief? Is everyone to whom we are giving “tax relief” a tax-payer, because if they are not paying taxes, they are receiving welfare. And who are the 5% who are not getting tax relief? Are these the wealthiest tax-payers? If these are the wealthiest, these are the people that deserve the biggest tax relief because these are the people who create real permanent jobs and hire employees.

President Obama, there you go again. The government will determine where tax-payer money should go, not the market. That scares me, because the government never knows best where the money should go. You plan to invest in renewable energy, health care and education, once again the government decides for us? What a new concept! Didn’t FDR try this? And how long did it take America to recover from the Great Depression? This long-term plan you are talking about is simply more government programs. In essence, your long-term plan is bigger government. Bigger government results in more government dependence. Now I see.


In recent days, there have been misguided criticisms of this plan that echo the failed theories that helped lead us into this crisis -- the notion that tax cuts alone will solve all our problems; that we can meet our enormous tests with half-steps and piecemeal measures; that we can ignore fundamental challenges such as energy independence and the high cost of health care and still expect our economy and our country to thrive.

I reject these theories, and so did the American people when they went to the polls in November and voted resoundingly for change. They know that we have tried it those ways for too long. And because we have, our health-care costs still rise faster than inflation. Our dependence on foreign oil still threatens our economy and our security. Our children still study in schools that put them at a disadvantage. We've seen the tragic consequences when our bridges crumble and our levees fail.

Every day, our economy gets sicker -- and the time for a remedy that puts Americans back to work, jump-starts our economy and invests in lasting growth is now.

Now is the time to protect health insurance for the more than 8 million Americans at risk of losing their coverage and to computerize the health-care records of every American within five years, saving billions of dollars and countless lives in the process.


President Obama, tax cuts do work to stimulate the economy. The tax cuts of Presidents John Kennedy, Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush all resulted in major economic growth. But you are correct in saying that additional work must be done as well. We should also cut business taxes to encourage businesses to expand. And by cutting the capital gains tax rate and suspending the Mark-to-Market accounting rule, more liquidity would immediately be injected into the market. I know Mr. President this is a scary proposition for you since none of these stimulus items involve government programs.

Energy independence is a wonderful idea. However, we will need to continue to explore, develop and produce all types of energy including oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear, wind, solar and geothermal. Increasing restrictions on the exploration, development or production on any of these types of energy resources, proves that you are really not serious about energy independence.

President Obama you are correct. In November of 2008, the Democrats won the election. What change did the electorate vote for? Over the past eight years, President Bush, along with the Congress increased spending and the size of government. Are saying that the voters expect a change there? That is change I can believe in. If our representatives and you President Obama were seriously committed to reducing government spending and the size of government, you would see restored confidence in the market that you have not seen in quite some time. Or are you talking about fundamentally changing the constitutionally-based republic and free-market capitalist system upon which this great country is founded? If you are talking about changing that, I think that you are very mistaken in believing that the majority of the American people want that change.

President Obama, if you are serious about lowering health care costs then cut unnecessary health care regulation, support tort reform to reduce the number of frivolous lawsuits and enforce our borders in order to control illegal immigration. These three measures would bring about significant change that the majority of the American people believe in.

President Obama, educational problems will not be reduced and schools improved by simply increasing federal spending on K-12 schools. In order to improve the overall education system, help create an environment that facilitates school choice to parents, rewards good schools that are successful at teaching children and embraces the creation of competition in K-12 education, especially in impoverished areas. Look at what the KIPP schools have done: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/19/AR2008091900978.html.

The economy has gotten sicker and sicker over the past four to five months but not because of lack of government intervention. It is precisely this large injection of government intervention that has unsettled a large share of businesses and people. It has stalled the market correction that is truly needed so the market can determine the winners and the losers, not the government. Once the market corrects itself, market confidence will begin to be restored which will again provide an environment for economic expansion and job creation. Confidence and stability in markets will not be restored through an increase in long-term government spending.


Now is the time to save billions by making 2 million homes and 75 percent of federal buildings more energy-efficient, and to double our capacity to generate alternative sources of energy within three years.

Now is the time to give our children every advantage they need to compete by upgrading 10,000 schools with state-of-the-art classrooms, libraries and labs; by training our teachers in math and science; and by bringing the dream of a college education within reach for millions of Americans.

And now is the time to create the jobs that remake America for the 21st century by rebuilding aging roads, bridges and levees; designing a smart electrical grid; and connecting every corner of the country to the information superhighway.

These are the actions Americans expect us to take without delay. They're patient enough to know that our economic recovery will be measured in years, not months. But they have no patience for the same old partisan gridlock that stands in the way of action while our economy continues to slide.

So we have a choice to make. We can once again let Washington's bad habits stand in the way of progress. Or we can pull together and say that in America, our destiny isn't written for us but by us. We can place good ideas ahead of old ideological battles, and a sense of purpose above the same narrow partisanship. We can act boldly to turn crisis into opportunity and, together, write the next great chapter in our history and meet the test of our time.


President Obama, these programs are exciting to one constituency group or another but a larger share of the American people see these programs for what they truly are. These programs are simply a way for the federal government to increase its power and control on the American people. Basically instead of increasing liquidity into the markets, these programs will siphon money away from the marketplace in the form of future taxes and fees. Someone has to pay for these programs and it is not the people who do not pay taxes.

The “Stimulus” bill was slammed through the House without a single Republican vote and the Democrats have enough votes to easily pass this bill in the Senate. Why do you want or need Republicans to vote for this bill? If you need this bill passed as soon as possible to turn this crisis around and help the American people, President Obama you have the votes in the Senate to make it happen. My opinion is that you want Republican support so when the economy does not turn around after this bill is passed you will have “cover” to say, well we tried but our bi-partisan “Stimulus” bill was not enough. This will then give you the opportunity to request even more government spending and programs to “jump-start” the economy. Basically you will say the initial bill did some good but it was not enough so let’s spend more tax-payer money.

Finally, President Obama, you and your administration have significantly contributed to the “bad habits” of Washington. Upon some of your cabinet and administration nominations or appointments, it has been revealed that your appointees have violated the tax laws. This corruptness creates cynicism and undermines the respect that people should have for those important offices. These instances help to promote the notion that there really are two sets of rules, one set for us normal Joes and another for those who wield and control the power.

After reading President Obama’s opinion editorial piece, I am also reminded of the President who truly helped bring change to Washington, President Ronald Reagan. President Obama would do well to read the following two quotes, and take them to heart:

1) “Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.”

2) “The problem is not that people are taxed too little, the problem is that government spends too much.”

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

This is not a Stimulus Bill & Over 300 Economists Agree

Over 300 economists agree that the current stimulus bill will not stimulate the economy:
http://www.cato.org/special/stimulus09/cato_stimulus.pdf. History has shown over and over again that increased government spending does not pull economies out of recession or depression. As I have said in previous posts, the way government can provide an environment for economic growth is lower the tax burden on individuals and corporations and remove impediments to work, invest and produce.

Monday, February 2, 2009

Advice for Judd Gregg

Okay, so how exactly would Senator Judd Gregg benefit from becoming Commerce Secretary for the Obama Administration? I just do not get it. Why would he accept such a post?

We have heard promises before from Democrats. So, just how can Republicans be guaranteed that Governor Lynch will nominate a solid Republican for the remainder of Senator Gregg's term? Here is Governor Lynch's statement regarding the appointment of Senator Gregg: http://www.governor.nh.gov/news/2009/020209.html. I especially love the last paragraph where Governor Lynch states "...I will name a replacement who will put the people of New Hampshire first..." So what does that mean exactly?

As everyone knows there are only two guarantees in life: death and taxes. And with Democrats heading both the legislative and executive branches we are guaranteed more of both.

Well, if you can't win a 60-seat majority through an election then just appoint your opponents to second-tier cabinet positions. And Republicans are dumb enough to say, yes and thank you President Obama, may I have another.

Ann Althouse says it well here: http://althouse.blogspot.com/2009/02/gregg-could-go-down-as-biggest-sucker.html

Note to Senator Judd Gregg of New Hampshire: Don't take it!

Sunday, February 1, 2009

Middle-Class Beware

Now that Vice President Joe Biden will head the newly formed Middle Class Working Families Task Force, I am reassured that more of my hard-earned money will be ripped from my pockets. Afterall, I do want to perform my patriotic duty (http://primebuzz.kcstar.com/?q=node/14475).

Just what exactly will this Task Force do? One thing I am sure of, is that this task force will be wasting lots of tax-payer money without any results. Who will they be accountable to? I am sure this video will explain everything.





Joe Biden will help to make sure that the Middle Class will not be left behind. Now give me a break. It sounds like this Task Force will be full of people that like to hear themselves talk.


Vice President Biden the best way to help the Middle Class is to cut our taxes, reduce government spending and then get government out of the way.